We honestly surprised it took nearly three years to get a Snopes submission!

In case you need it, here’s the description of Snopes from their Wikipedia entry: /ˈsnoʊps/, also known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, is a website covering urban legends, Internet rumors, e-mail forwards, and other stories of unknown or questionable origin.[2] It is a well-known resource for validating and debunking such stories in American popular culture,[3] receiving 300,000 visits a day.[4] was created by Barbara and David Mikkelson, a California couple who met in the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup.[5] The site is organized by topic and includes a message board where stories and pictures of questionable veracity may be posted.

Let us be clear on one thing: We are happy to have people question Snopes.


Because we here at Real or Satire want you to think critically. Demand sources. And then demand sources of those sources.

And there are scores of hit-pieces on Snopes. Most of them come mainly from sites who have had one of their stories challenged and debunked by Snopes. Some are quite angry about it (Angry Patriot Movement, Your News Wire, Daily Caller) while others at least don’t break character (The Peoples Cube.)

Snopes has their own hit-piece . . . on itself! They post E-mails that they’ve allegedly received that show that people of all political leanings accuse Snopes of bias. Snopes themselves bemoans:

According to our readership, we’re all those things — from what they tell us, we’ve performed the remarkable feat of being decidedly biased in every possible direction: has a pretty sizable albeit older article about Snopes, which ends with this healthy bit of advice:

The e-mail’s last paragraph advises that everyone who goes to for “the bottom line facts” should “proceed with caution.” We think that’s terrific advice, not just in connection with material on Snopes but for practically anything a reader finds online — including articles on The very reason we list our sources (as does and provide links is so that readers can check things out for themselves.

That said, be warned: Snopes does have a section that’s a section of urban legends completely (as best they know) made up by them, called “The Repository of Lost Legends.” Get it?

A Snopes piece over on wrote it best:

[…T]he Mikkelsons make no claim to infallibility and insist that their highest objective is to help convince people to think critically about what they hear and read … and to do their own fact checking.

In the end, that’s what sites like Snopes (and ultimately Real or Satire) want readers to do: think!

  • PoliticallyIncorrect2

    Snopes “real?” Puhleeeeease! Your “Real or Satire” website reeks of fake reviews from biased, leftist shills.

    • Mike Bond

      Because only the right wing, conservative shills should be trusted, right? They’re the ones cracking cases like “PizzaGate” (and other totally real, not at all made up conspiracy nonsense) wide open!

    • Secret Name

      lol… when your opposition is so stupid it bears the flag of a defeated traitor army that represents backwardness. Too easy… thanks for helping snopes’ credibility, politicallyincorrect2.

      • crob000

        Snopes, homes of the people that do not know anything and use google to find facts but end up at snopes… I tried talk to the editor to one of their pages due to it not fitting the definition in a dictionary but they told me I was biased and should not critique people. I guess they do not know what the word fascism is and can not be bothered to show it either. Very factual when you spin definitions of words and censor anyone that says otherwise with dictionary references. I suppose Websters dictionary has been lying to us this whole time.

  • Constitution_Lover

    Snopes is totally left-wing. Even when they have to grudgingly admit something that should be in favor of the right, they put a spin on it favoring the left. Every. Single. Time.

  • jeff whitehall

    I find it curious that all those who like to display the Confederate Flag, are most often offended by anyone who takes a knee during the anthem.

  • FiveF

    confirmed this site is “fake news” by yet another obviously unverified site being listed as “real”. This entire site is meant to try to find the website reporting accurate information and make them appear not valid. Bye

    • crob000

      You sound upset about Snopes not using real definitions and making up words. Most people agree, Snopes is confirmed, fake and can be confirmed by other fake sites stating it as real. Most tabloids site Snopes. Snopes that released the documents against the president and is now suing the source (DNC) due to there being no evidence and Snopes is in multiple lawsuits for slander and their lies dealing with it.

  • but but but

    This website is the marriage of two California wino’s that no more credibility than Killer Clinton, and if you believe their substance, you are no smarter than a 2 year old!

  • Mary Alice Richert

    Does Amazon sell guns?

    • lion575a

      Would not be possible for them to do so. They have no way of conducting a personal background check or verifying the purchaser.

  • lion575a

    Snopes is propaganda plain and simple. They post incomplete data and cherry pick information and then play the *Partial Truth* card and include a smidgen of true information in their article to play up the credibility of the blatantly false info they put out. So many mindless idiots take them at face value because they dont follow the data points and underlying stats they use to propagate false info.

  • A. Baca

    I have been in Journalism for many years, and I can smell bias a mile away. It’s a shame that Snopes has now heavily injected caustic blatant bias in their so called objective reporting.

Copy and paste any article URL below. We'll tell you if it's real.